
Treatment of 3 or 4-part proximal humerus fracture: surgical vs. non-surgical treatment

Treatment of 3 or 4-part proximal humerus fracture: surgical vs. non-surgical treatment
Comparison of Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment of Displaced 3- and 4-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Meta-Analysis
J Invest Surg. 2015 Aug;28(4):215-24.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
5 randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment of displaced 3 or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient outcome differed depending on whether a surgical or non-surgical method was used for the treatment of a fracture. Functional outcome was the primary outcome of interest...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.