To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroplasty alternative to discectomy & fusion for cervical degenerative disc disease

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2015

Arthroplasty alternative to discectomy & fusion for cervical degenerative disc disease

Vol: 4| Issue: 10| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:115-25.

Contributing Authors:
J Luo S Huang M Gong X Dai M Gao T Yu Z Zhou X Zou

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

13 studies comparing two surgical treatments of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with total disc replacement (TDR). Results of this study found TDR as a viable alternative to ACDF in the treatment of CDDD given the similarity among adverse...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue