To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Artificial disc replacement not superior to traditional fusion in cervical radiculopathy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2015

Artificial disc replacement not superior to traditional fusion in cervical radiculopathy

Vol: 4| Issue: 10| Number:52| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy-a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up

Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1284-94.

Contributing Authors:
M Skeppholm L Lindgren T Henriques L Vavruch H Löfgren C Olerud

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

153 patients with radiculopathy in the cervical spine were randomized to receive treatment with either an artificial disc replacement device (ADR), or the traditional anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in order to determine the more effective procedure. Findings showed that at 2 postoperative years, neck disability index and quality of life measures were comparable between the two g...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue