Risk of implant fracture, squeaking significantly increased with COC vs COP THA
Risk of implant fracture, squeaking significantly increased with COC vs COP THA
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Versus Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Orthopedics. 2015 Apr 1;38(4):e331-8Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Nine randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis comparing revision and complication rates between ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Meta-analyses demonstrated no significant differences between the surface bearing types in revision rate, or incidences of complications such as osteolysis, component loosening, infection, heterotopic ossifica...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.