To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Vol:4 Issue:5 Number:19 ISSN#:2564-2537
DOWNLOAD ESPAÑOL
Author Verified
RCT
ACE Report #7705
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

General anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for fast-track total hip arthroplasty


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. General anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for fast-track total hip arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2015;4(5):19. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/7705

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):298-309.

Contributing Authors: A Harsten H Kehlet P Ljung S Toksvig-Larsen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Dr. Harsten discusses the possible benefits of general anaesthesia in total hip arthroplasty.

Synopsis

118 patients undergoing fast-track total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to receive general anaesthesia (GA), with propofol and remifentanil, or spinal anaesthesia (SA). The purpose of the study was to compare these two anaesthetic approaches in terms of length of hospital stay (LOS), short-term outcomes of well-being, and patient satisfaction at 6 months. Results indicated that general ana...

Ace Report Preview Image
CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.