
Similar migration and lower radiolucency with cementless vs cemented UKA

Similar migration and lower radiolucency with cementless vs cemented UKA
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: A randomised controlled trial
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Forty-seven patients scheduled for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with an Oxford implant were randomized to either cemented or cementless fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fixation types differed with respect to radiostereometric migration. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The only consistent difference that was noted between g...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.