
Incidence of malalignment not reduced with PSCG vs. conventional instrumentation in TKA

Incidence of malalignment not reduced with PSCG vs. conventional instrumentation in TKA
A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):56-63Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
140 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to have the procedure completed using either patient specific instrumentation or conventional intramedullary instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological, clinical, and perioperative data between groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of outliers in mechanical axis alignment, with >3degrees deviatio...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.