To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant difference between Dabigatran etexilate and enoxaparin in VTE occurrence

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

No significant difference between Dabigatran etexilate and enoxaparin in VTE occurrence

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:161| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):949-56

Contributing Authors:
BI Eriksson OE Dahl N Rosencher AA Kurth CN van Dijk SP Frostick MH Prins R Hettiarachchi S Hantel J Schnee HR Büller

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

3494 patients undergoing total hip replacement were randomized to either receive 220mg of Dabigatran etexilate, 150mg of Dabigatran etexilate, or enoxaparin. The results following the treatment period (33 days) indicate that there were no significant differences between all three groups in terms of reducing the risk of major venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. In addition the safety ou...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue