LOGIN
Distal third tibial fractures: Internal/external fixation vs percutaneous osteosynthesis
January 2015
Distal third tibial fractures: Internal/external fixation vs percutaneous osteosynthesis
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Management of distal third tibial fractures: comparison of combined internal and external fixation with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2349-55Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
44 skeletally mature patients with displaced distal third tibial fractures were randomized to undergo combined internal and external fixation (CIEF) versus minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), with the purpose of comparing the efficacy of both surgical techniques. Both treatments resulted in similar time to bone union, time to recovery to work, function, alignment, and tot...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.