To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty at 2years

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2016

Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty at 2years

Vol: 5| Issue: 12| Number:46| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Report With Minimum 2-Year Results

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):179-81.

Contributing Authors:
DF Scott RR Smith

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

111 patients eligible for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to receive either a posterior stablized (PS) post/cam tibial insert or a more congruent cruciate-substituting (CS) insert. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes during the postoperative period and radiographic and functional outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up between the two devices. At 2-years ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.