To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference in 5-yr survival between computer-assisted and conventional TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2014

No difference in 5-yr survival between computer-assisted and conventional TKA

Vol: 3| Issue: 11| Number:61| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-up of 200 Patients in a Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1795-802

Contributing Authors:
J Cip M Widemschek M Luegmair MB Sheinkop T Benesch A Martin

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

200 patients scheduled to total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either receive a component implantation using computer assistance or through the conventional technique. The purpose was to determine if groups differed in component survival, radiological, clinical evaluation or clinical scoring at a minimum of 5 years follow-up. Overall, no significant difference in component survival was obser...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.