
No difference in 5-yr survival between computer-assisted and conventional TKA

No difference in 5-yr survival between computer-assisted and conventional TKA
Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-up of 200 Patients in a Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1795-802Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
200 patients scheduled to total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either receive a component implantation using computer assistance or through the conventional technique. The purpose was to determine if groups differed in component survival, radiological, clinical evaluation or clinical scoring at a minimum of 5 years follow-up. Overall, no significant difference in component survival was obser...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.