To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Better clinical outcome with kinematically vs. mechanically aligned TKAs

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2014

Better clinical outcome with kinematically vs. mechanically aligned TKAs

Vol: 3| Issue: 10| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: Two-year clinical results

Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):907-13. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812.

Contributing Authors:
HG Dossett NA Estrada GJ Swartz GW LeFevre BG Kwasman

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

120 patients with end-stage arthritis were randomized to either undergo kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patient-specific guides or mechanically aligned TKA with intramedullary instrumentation, to compare outcomes of pain, function, and range of motion after 2 years. The results indicated that clinical outcomes, proportion of pain-free patients, and flexion active range of ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue