
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Can J Surg. 2014 Jun;57(3):E105-E118Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
A systematic review and network meta-analysis containing 27 RCTs that focused on low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography (LIPUS) or electrical stimulators (ESTIM) was conducted to examine the effect of either treatment on fracture healing. Results from the systematic review and network analysis indicated that low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography (LIPUS) and electrical stimulators (ESTIM) result in co...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.