Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:2 Issue:6 Number:77 ISSN#:2563-5476
ACE Report #6547
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

EFORT: Patient specific instrumentation for TKA vs. standard instrumentation

Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Alignment Of Patient Specific Instrumented Total Knee Replacement Is No Better Than Conventional Instrumented - A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial

Contributing Authors: TA Bucher I Gill L Solan RJ Beaver

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.


64 Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomized to evaluate the efficacy of patient specific instrumentation (PIS) against the conventional approach. Patients were monitored over 1 year and were evaluated based on alignment (Perth CT protocol), and intraoperative and functional outcomes. The evidence from this presentation revealed no associated benefits in alignment, functional out...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.


Please Login or Join to leave comments.