To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction offers less knee laxity than single-bundle

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2014

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction offers less knee laxity than single-bundle

Vol: 3| Issue: 7| Number:85| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1009-23. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2811-6. Epub 2013 Dec 17

Contributing Authors:
N Desai H Bjornsson V Musahl M Bhandari M Petzold FH Fu K Samuelsson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Dr. FH. Fu speaks about their recent meta-analysis examining differences between anatomic single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Synopsis

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis which compared knee kinematics and graft failure rates between anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Pooled estimates of knee laxity (side-to-side difference in AP laxity measured by KT-1000 and antero-posterior...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.