To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Resistance training and PEMF in hemophilia patients with osteoporosis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2014

Resistance training and PEMF in hemophilia patients with osteoporosis

Vol: 3| Issue: 10| Number:46| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effects of short-term resistance training and pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone metabolism and joint function in severe haemophilia A patients with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial

Clin Rehabil. 2014 May;28(5):440-50. doi: 10.1177/0269215513505299. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Contributing Authors:
B Parhampour G Torkaman H Hoorfar M Hedayati R Ravanbod

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

48 patients with severe haemophilia A and osteoporosis were randomized to one of four groups: (1) resistance training [RT] + sham pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF); (2) RT+ PEMF; (3) PEMF only; and (4) control group [i.e. no intervention]. These interventions occurred over a period of 6 weeks to determine the effect of resistance training and PEMF on bone biomarkers and joint function. Results ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue