To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Vol:3 Issue:5 Number:68 ISSN#:2564-2537
DOWNLOAD ESPAÑOL
RCT
ACE Report #6411
Ace Report Cover Trauma

ECTES: Interscalene block vs. general anaesthesia for proximal humerus fracture fixation


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. ECTES: Interscalene block vs. general anaesthesia for proximal humerus fracture fixation. ACE Report. 2014;3(5):68. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/6411

Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A comparison of interscalene block anaesthesia and general anaesthesia in patients with proximal humerus fracture

Contributing Authors: S Baranovic M Milosevic B Bakota

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

50 patients suffering from a proximal humerus fracture of the shoulder were randomized to evaluate the efficacy of interscalene block anaesthesia (ISBA) against general anaesthesia (GA). Treatments were evaluated based on VAS pain, time needed to prepare anaesthesia, duration of operation, hemodynamic and respiratory stability, loss of blood during operation, use of analgesics postoperatively, and...

Ace Report Preview Image
CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.