To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Minimally invasive longitudinal versus sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2014

Minimally invasive longitudinal versus sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures

Vol: 3| Issue: 6| Number:48| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated in a minimally invasive fashion: longitudinal approach versus sinus tarsi approach

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):302-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01215

Contributing Authors:
T Zhang Y Su W Chen Q Zhang Z Wu Y Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

167 patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were randomized to surgery using either a minimally invasive longitudinal approach (MILA) or sinus tarsi approach (STA). The purpose was to compare functional and radiographic outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications. In Sanders type II and III fractures, the MILA was associated with similar functional and radiographic outc...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue