To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

DC electrical stimulation does not improve fusion mass bone quality

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

DC electrical stimulation does not improve fusion mass bone quality

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:74| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion in older patients

Euro Spine Journal; 2010; 19; 2200-2208

Contributing Authors:
T Andersen FB Christensen BL Langdahl C Ernst S Fruensgaard J Ostergaard JL Andersen S Rasmussen B Niedermann K Høy P Helmig R Holm BE Lindblad ES Hansen N Egund C Bünger

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

98 patients, aged 60 or above, with spinal stenosis to undergo posterolateral spinal fusion using fresh frozen allograft were randomized to receive no electrical stimulation or 40 or 100 microA DC stimulation for a period of at least 6 months. The results of the study indicate that at 1-year follow-up, DC electrical stimulation did not improve fusion mass bone quality. It was observed that smokers...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue