To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference in darexaban taken qd or bid at 30 or 60 mg total in preventing VTE post-THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
June 2014

No difference in darexaban taken qd or bid at 30 or 60 mg total in preventing VTE post-THA

Vol: 3| Issue: 6| Number:89| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Darexaban (YM150) versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a randomised phase IIb dose confirmation study (ONYX-3)

Thromb Haemost. 2014 Jan 29;111(2):213-25. doi: 10.1160/TH13-04-0296.

Contributing Authors:
BI Eriksson G Agnelli AS Gallus MR Lassen MH Prins RW Renfurm M Kashiwa AG Turpie

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

1992 patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either oral darexaban (YM150) (at 15 mg bid, 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, or 60 mg qd) or 40 mg enoxaparin qd. Incidence of VTEs or death was the primary outcome, and incidence of bleeding and adverse events were part of the safety analysis. No significant differences were found between bid and qd darexaban dosing, as well...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue