To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Fragility Index to aid in the interpretation of significant findings from RCTs

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2014

Fragility Index to aid in the interpretation of significant findings from RCTs

Vol: 3| Issue: 5| Number:61| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Non-Clinical
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 5. pii: S0895-4356(13)00466-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019

Contributing Authors:
M Walsh G Guyatt SD Walter L Thabane SK Srinathan DF McAuley M Mrkobrada O Levine C Ribic AO Molnar ND Dattani A Burke J Pogue PJ Devereaux

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

While P-values in clinical studies are an easy method to denote statistical significance, the interpretation of significant findings can be somewhat skewed. The Fragility Index is a newly developed metric that complements p-values and confidence intervals. It is calculated by adding consecutive events to a significant dichotomous finding until the result is no longer significant. The number of eve...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue