Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:3 Issue:2 Number:45 ISSN#:2563-5476
Author Verified
Meta-analysis
ACE Report #5806
Ace Report Cover Shoulder & Elbow

Displaced proximal humerus fracture: Joint-preserving techniques vs. Arthroplasty


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Displaced proximal humerus fracture: Joint-preserving techniques vs. Arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2014;3(2):45. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/5806

Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Meta-analysis of joint preservation versus arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus

Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1532-9

Contributing Authors: MM Gomberawalla BS Miller RM Coale A Bedi JJ Gagnier

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Dr. Gomberawalla discusses joint-preserving techniques vs. arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fracture.

Synopsis

Data from 12 studies (4 RCTs; 8 cohort studies), spanning 610 patients was analyzed in order to compare joint-preserving techniques and arthroplasty in the treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. The evidence presented in this meta-analysis/systemic review indicated that joint-preserving treatments demonstrated higher Constant scores than arthroplasty. It is important to note that t...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.