Ultrasound guided vs. computed tomography controlled injections for cervical radiculopathy
Ultrasound guided vs. computed tomography controlled injections for cervical radiculopathy
Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-controlled periradicular injections in the middle and lower cervical spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2532-7Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
40 patients, over the age of 18 years, with subacute to chronic radiculopathy of the middle or lower cervical spine were randomly assigned to compare the effect of ultrasound guided periradicular injection versus computed tomography (CT)-controlled intervention for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy in terms of safety, pain relief, accuracy, time saving, and radiation dose 4 weeks after inter...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.