To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Double-bundle hamstring autograft superior to bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2014

Double-bundle hamstring autograft superior to bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in ACLR

Vol: 3| Issue: 2| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Mar;19(3):390-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1225-y. Epub 2010 Jul 29

Contributing Authors:
S Zaffagnini D Bruni GM Marcheggiani Muccioli T Bonanzinga N Lopomo S Bignozzi M Marcacci

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

90 patients (79 at follow-up) with a unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were randomized to undergo ACL reconstruction using either the non-anatomical double-bundle hamstring autograft technique (naDBH) or the lateralized bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (LBPTB) technique. At a minimum follow-up of 8 years, the naDBH group yielded significantly better pivot-shift test scores and...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.

Continue