To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Short, Metaphyseal-Fitting Cementless Anatomical Femoral Component vs. long stem in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Short, Metaphyseal-Fitting Cementless Anatomical Femoral Component vs. long stem in THA

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:116| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Changes Around Short, Metaphyseal-Fitting, and Conventional Cementless Anatomical Femoral Components

The Journal of Arthroplasty; 2011; 26(6): 931-940

Contributing Authors:
Young-Hoo Kim Yoowang Choi Jun-Shik Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

120 hips in 100 patients undergoing primary, cement-less Total Hip Arthroplasty were randomized to received a short, metaphyseal-fitting femoral component, and another group received a conventional metaphyseal- and diaphyseal- filling femoral component. They were followed up for 3.35 years. Bone mineral density was significantly increased in femoral zone 1 but slightly decreased in zone 7 in the s...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue