LOGIN
COA: Surgical Vs. conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
July 2013
COA: Surgical Vs. conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A prospective comparative study to compared percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty to conservative methods in treatment patients with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures a clinical follow up for 2 years
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
45 osteoporotic compression fracture patients were randomized to be treated with either percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty or conservative treatment, both combined with medical line prevention of osteoporosis. Two year results aimed to compare both methods in terms of pain, physical activities, functional outcome, and mental status. The results, measured by Stanford and Oswestry Disabiliti...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.