To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ACL Reconstruction: Femoral tunnel placement more posterior with AMP technique

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

ACL Reconstruction: Femoral tunnel placement more posterior with AMP technique

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:596| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Femoral tunnel position on conventional magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young men: transtibial technique versus anteromedial portal technique

Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.025. Epub 2013 Mar 26

Contributing Authors:
JH Noh YH Roh BG Yang SR Yi SY Lee

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

64 young men with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury were randomized to undergo reconstruction with either the transtibial (TT) or anteromedial portal (AMP) technique for femoral tunnel placement. The purpose of the study was twofold: First, to determine the tunnel placement and clinical outcome associated with each procedure, and second, if there was a significant difference in outcome be...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue