LOGIN
ISAKOS: Patient-specific cutting guides comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKR
May 2013
ISAKOS: Patient-specific cutting guides comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKR
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
80 patients were randomized to either patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) or conventional instrumentation TKA to compare the accuracy of limb alignment and component positioning in total knee replacement. Post-surgical radiographs, perioperative time, blood loss and need of transfusion showed no significant differences in tibiofemoral angle or femoral component alignment or other outcomes. PSC...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.