LOGIN
ISAKOS: Normalizing knee rotational stability: anatomical vs non-anatomical ACLR methods
May 2013
ISAKOS: Normalizing knee rotational stability: anatomical vs non-anatomical ACLR methods
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Rotational Stiffness of ACL Reconstructed Knees Measured by 3D- Motion Analysis. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Anatomic and Non-Anatomic ACL Reconstruction Techniques
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
45 patients were randomized to undergo either non-anatomical (single-bundle transtibial) or anatomical (single-bundle anteromedial, or double-bundle) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in order to compare which technique was most effective in returning normal knee rotational stability. Following 1 year of evaluation, no differences were discovered in sagittal and rotational knee stab...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.