LOGIN
ISASS: Reoperation rates higher in ACDF patients than C-ADR at 7 year follow-up
April 2013
ISASS: Reoperation rates higher in ACDF patients than C-ADR at 7 year follow-up
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
7-year Reoperation Rates: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial: Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Fusion
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
345 patients experiencing single-level symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease were divided into randomized and non-randomized groups. The 209 patients in the randomized group were randomized to undergo either cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), in order to compare the reoperation rates of the two surgical procedures. Following eva...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.