To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ISASS: Reoperation rates higher in ACDF patients than C-ADR at 7 year follow-up

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

ISASS: Reoperation rates higher in ACDF patients than C-ADR at 7 year follow-up

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:99| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

7-year Reoperation Rates: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial: Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Fusion

Contributing Authors:
RB Delamarter J Zigler D Murrey M Janssen J Spivak

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

345 patients experiencing single-level symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease were divided into randomized and non-randomized groups. The 209 patients in the randomized group were randomized to undergo either cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), in order to compare the reoperation rates of the two surgical procedures. Following eva...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue