To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ACL Reconstruction: Neither Calaxo or Milagro bioabsorbable screws increase bone formation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

ACL Reconstruction: Neither Calaxo or Milagro bioabsorbable screws increase bone formation

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:160| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Randomized controlled trial of osteoconductive fixation screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the Calaxo and Milagro screws

Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):74-82

Contributing Authors:
HE Bourke LJ Salmon A Waller CS Winalski HA Williams JM Linklater A Vasanji JP Roe LA Pinczewski

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients were randomized to determine the effect of osteoconductive bioabsorbable screw type for interference fixation in ACL reconstruction. Patients received either Calaxo or Milagro bioabsorbable screws, and were followed for 2 years postoperatively. The results revealed that the Calaxo screw achieved faster resorption (6 months) compared to ongoing resorption of the Milagro screw at 24 mont...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue