To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Computer-assisted surgery improves mechanical axis and component orientation for TKAs

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2013

Computer-assisted surgery improves mechanical axis and component orientation for TKAs

Vol: 2| Issue: 5| Number:13| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Systematic review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jul;20(7):1307-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8. Epub 2011 Jul 6

Contributing Authors:
T Cheng S Zhao X Peng X Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were identified to examine whether computer-assisted surgery (CAS) would lead to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning compared to conventional technique in patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results for leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components indicated a statistically significant reduct...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue