
Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: accelerated vs traditional rehab

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: accelerated vs traditional rehab
A randomized trial comparing accelerated and traditional approaches to postoperative weightbearing rehabilitation after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: findings at 5 years
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1527-37. doi: 10.1177/0363546512445167. Epub 2012 Apr 26Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
70 patients were randomized to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of an accelerated weight bearing rehabilitation program to a traditional rehabilitation program in patients who underwent matrix-induced autologous chrondrocyte implantation (MACI). Over a 5-year follow-up period there were no significant differences were seen between the two groups in clinical or radiographic outcomes.
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.