THA: No advantage of minimally invasive technique over the standard technique
THA: No advantage of minimally invasive technique over the standard technique
Comparison of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed with a Minimally Invasive Technique or a Standard Technique
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Dec;21(8):1092-8Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
70 patients (140 hips) undergoing primary bilateral simultaneous total hip arthroplasties (THA) underwent both minimally invasive and standard posterolateral techniques to compare surgical parameters, component positioning and safety. The type of procedure was randomly assigned to a side and the other procedures was performed on the contralateral side. The operative time and the duration of the ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.