To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Functional activity programme not beneficial in improving function in elderly residents

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

Functional activity programme not beneficial in improving function in elderly residents

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:85| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Does a functional activity programme improve function, quality of life, and falls for residents in long term care? Cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ. 2008 Oct 9;337:a1445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1445

Contributing Authors:
N Kerse K Peri E Robinson T Wilkinson M von Randow L Kiata J Parsons N Latham M Parsons J Willingale P Brown B Arroll

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

682 elderly subjects from residential care homes, over the age of 65, were randomized to either a functional activity programme or social visits to determine the effect of an activity program on function, quality of life and the occurrence of falls. The results after a one year follow-up indicated that the activity programme did not positively affect physical function in elderly individuals in res...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue