To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Drained vs. undrained wounds: No significant difference in outcomes following hip surgery

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

Drained vs. undrained wounds: No significant difference in outcomes following hip surgery

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:147| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Closed suction surgical wound drainage after hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Int Orthop. 2008 Dec;32(6):723-7. Epub 2007 Aug 9

Contributing Authors:
R Clifton S Haleem A McKee MJ Parker

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

This meta-analysis and systematic review identified 6 randomized trials that compared the use of closed suction drainage compared to no drainage in hip fracture surgery. A total of 664 patients were identified from these 6 studies. Results from the analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between drained and undrained wounds, in terms of wound infection, wound haematoma, re-op...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue