To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mini-open repair of full-thickness rotator cuff injuries expedites recovery and QOL

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Mini-open repair of full-thickness rotator cuff injuries expedites recovery and QOL

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:284| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Prognosis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Open to Arthroscopic Acromioplasty With Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Disease-Specific Quality of Life Outcome at an Average 2-Year Follow-Up

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1043-51. Epub 2008 Mar 19

Contributing Authors:
NG Mohtadi RM Hollinshead TM Sasyniuk JA Fletcher DS Chan FX Li

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

73 patients with full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff were randomized to repair using a mini-open (scope mini-open) or open procedure. Follow-up at two years indicated there were no differences in long term functional and clinical outcomes. However, at short term 3 and 6 month follow-ups, the scope mini-open procedure provided superior rotator cuff specific quality of life scores.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue