To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Pre-emptive femoral nerve blockade does not reduce pain following ACL reconstruction

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2013

Pre-emptive femoral nerve blockade does not reduce pain following ACL reconstruction

Vol: 2| Issue: 4| Number:54| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Femoral nerve blockade as a preemptive anesthetic in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):78-86. Epub 2008 Oct 20

Contributing Authors:
MJ Matava WD Prickett S Khodamoradi S Abe J Garbutt

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

56 patients undergoing endoscopic patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were recruited to this double blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive additional analgesic treatment using either a femoral nerve block (FNB) or a saline injection, in combination with local anesthesia. The results from this trial indicated that the FNB did not provide reduction in pain score...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue