To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

HXLPE acetabular liners have 40% lower wear rate compared to UHMWPE at 2 years after THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

HXLPE acetabular liners have 40% lower wear rate compared to UHMWPE at 2 years after THA

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:224| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Does highly cross-linked polyethylene wear less than conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty? A double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis

J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr;23(3):337-43.

Contributing Authors:
S Glyn-Jones S Isaac J Hauptfleisch P McLardy-Smith DW Murray HS Gill

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

54 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis, scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty, were randomized to receive either highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) or standard ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners. Roentgen stereophotogrammateic analysis (RSA) was conducted to determine the 3-dimensional penetration of the liners over 2 years. Despite similar considerable wear ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue