To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Early ACL reconstructions do not result in loss of motion or suboptimal clinical results

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Early ACL reconstructions do not result in loss of motion or suboptimal clinical results

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:223| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Postoperative Range of Motion Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autograft Hamstrings: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Versus Delayed Reconstructions

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):656-62. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

Contributing Authors:
Craig R Bottoni Travis R Liddell Timothy J Trainor David M Freccero Kenneth K Lindell

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

69 patients (>18 years of age) with an ACL injury (clinically and MRI confirmed) scheduled for an ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft were randomized to the timing of surgery either early (within 21 days) or delayed (beyond 6 weeks of the injury). This study aimed to compare incidence of postoperative motion loss and clinical results. Excellent clinical results were seen with ACL r...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue