
Piriformis sparing THR doesn't provide long-term improvement over the standard approach

Piriformis sparing THR doesn't provide long-term improvement over the standard approach
A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: a randomised controlled trial
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):43-50Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
100 patients undergoing total hip replacement were randomized to either piriformis sparing minimally invasive procedure or current standard posterior approach. The results of this double blind study indicated that there was a trend towards superior function at 2 week follow-up. However, these trends diminished over time resulting in no significant long-term differences in functional outcomes. Sur...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.