To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Glucosamine sulphate for 12 months reduces relative risk of TJR at a 5 year follow-up

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Glucosamine sulphate for 12 months reduces relative risk of TJR at a 5 year follow-up

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:202| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Total joint replacement after glucosamine sulphate treatment in knee osteoarthritis: Results of a mean 8-year observation of patients from two previous 3-year, randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):254-60

Contributing Authors:
O Bruyere K Pavelka LC Rovati J Gatterova G Giacovelli M Olejarova R Deroisy JY Reginster

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

275 patients were compiled from two initial studies that lasted 3 years to assess the effectiveness of glucosamine sulphate treatment in osteoarthritis (OA). This retrospective study included patients who had undergone treatment with placebo or glucosamine sulphate, 1500 mg once daily, between 12 and 36 months. Patients were followed-up 5 years following the cessation of the original study to dete...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue