
Atelocollagen vs. Prolotherapy in Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears:

Atelocollagen vs. Prolotherapy in Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears:
Atelocollagen vs. Prolotherapy in Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial with MRI-Confirmed Outcomes.
Pain Physician . 2025 Jul;28(4):299-306.Synopsis
Thirty-four patients with partial-thickness supraspinatus tears were randomized to ultrasound-guided prolotherapy with 20% dextrose (n=17) or atelocollagen injections (n=17), each delivered in three weekly sessions. The primary outcome was change in pain (VAS) to 3 months. Secondary outcomes were K-SPADI and SCSS at 1 and 3 months, and MRI-based changes in tear status from baseline to 3 months. Ov...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.