To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Robotic Bi-UKA vs TKA: 2-Year RCT Outcomes

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2025

Robotic Bi-UKA vs TKA: 2-Year RCT Outcomes

Vol: 307| Issue: 9| Number:10| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2025 Jul;33(7):2571-2580.

Contributing Authors:
OM Farhan-Alanie J Doonan PJ Rowe MS Banger BG Jones AD MacLean MJG Blyth

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients with medial and lateral knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either robotic arm–assisted bi‐unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi‐UKA, n=27) or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n=33). The primary outcome was achievement of a biphasic sagittal knee moment pattern during gait. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Knee Score, New Knee Society Score (NKSS), Forgotten ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue