LOGIN
SICOT 2025: SLRS vs Double Row Repair for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
August 2025
SICOT 2025: SLRS vs Double Row Repair for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Single Row Load Sharing Rip-Stop (SLRS) Versus Double Row Repair With Or Without Knotting Of Medial Row For Large And Massive Cuff Tears- A Three Arm Randomised Trial
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Ninety patients with large (3–5 cm) and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears were randomized to undergo arthroscopic repair with SLRS (n=26), KD (n=26), or KL (n=24). The primary outcome was retear rate at one year, assessed by 3T MRI. Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM), ASES, Constant, UCLA, and VAS scores, measured up to a mean of 20–21 months. Overall, all three groups experienced ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.