To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Scaffold Augmentation vs Microfracture for Knee Cartilage Repair: No Short-Term Superiority Found

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2025

Scaffold Augmentation vs Microfracture for Knee Cartilage Repair: No Short-Term Superiority Found

Vol: 307| Issue: 8| Number:45| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Does scaffold enhancement show significant superiority over microfracture alone for treating knee chondral defects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2025 Jun;33(6):2027-2043.

Contributing Authors:
K Pałka M Kubisa A Akbas M Dobrakowski

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ten RCTs including 378 patients with focal knee chondral/osteochondral defects were included in this systematic review and meta‑analysis comparing microfracture plus scaffold augmentation versus microfracture alone. Pooled outcomes of interest included IKDC, KOOS, VAS, and MOCART. Across 12–24 months, pooled effects showed no significant superiority of scaffold augmentation over microfracture on I...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue