To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ACB and IPACK Block vs ACB Alone for Pain and Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction with BTB Autograft

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2025

ACB and IPACK Block vs ACB Alone for Pain and Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction with BTB Autograft

Vol: 307| Issue: 7| Number:50| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Postoperative Pain and Opioid Usage With Combined Adductor Canal and IPACK Block Versus Isolated Adductor Canal Block After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Am J Sports Med . 2025 May;53(6):1359-1367.

Contributing Authors:
N Rao J Triana A Avila KA Campbell MJ Alaia LM Jazrawi D Furiguele J Popovic EJ Strauss

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ninety-six patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft were randomized to receive either an adductor canal block alone (n=47) or a combination of adductor canal and IPACK block (n=49). The primary outcome was opioid consumption at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included opioid use at days 2, 3, and 7; visual a...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue