To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Posterior vs Anterior Cervical Surgery for Radiculopathy

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2025

Posterior vs Anterior Cervical Surgery for Radiculopathy

Vol: 307| Issue: 7| Number:47| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy: Two-Year Results of the FACET Randomized Noninferiority Study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jul 24;106(18):1653–1663.

Contributing Authors:
NF Simões de Souza AEH Broekema MF Reneman J Koopmans H van Santbrink MP Arts B Burhani RHMA Bartels NA van der Gaag MHP Verhagen K Tamási JMC van Dijk RJM Groen R Soer JMA Kuijlen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Two hundred sixty-five patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy were randomized to receive either posterior cervical foraminotomy (n=132) or anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (n=133). The primary outcomes were procedural success (based on Odom criteria) and reduction in arm pain (measured by VAS). Secondary outcomes included neck pain, Neck Disability Index, Work Ability Index, qua...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue