LOGIN
Efficacy and Safety of 3D Printing-Assisted vs. Conventional ORIF for Acetabular Fractures
July 2025
Efficacy and Safety of 3D Printing-Assisted vs. Conventional ORIF for Acetabular Fractures
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Efficacy and safety of three-dimensional printing technology assisted open reduction and internal fixation versus conventional surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
J Orthop Surg Res . 2025 May 27;20(1):518.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Nineteen randomized controlled trials including 1046 patients with acetabular fractures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 3D printing-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) vs. conventional ORIF. Pooled outcomes of interest included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, instrumentation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy, post-surgery Matta score, ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.