To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison Of Outcomes Of PCKP & UPKP For Single Segment Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

Comparison Of Outcomes Of PCKP & UPKP For Single Segment Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:22| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of near- and midterm outcomes of two unilateral percutaneous translaminar vertebral kyphoplasty procedures for the treatment of single-segment OVCF: a single-center randomized controlled study.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 1;35(1):142.

Contributing Authors:
Y Fuguo C Kang L Yuanchao H Renjian

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty-nine patients with single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) were randomized to receive either percutaneous curved kyphoplasty (PCKP; n=43) or unilateral percutaneous vertebral kyphoplasty (UPKP; n=46). The primary outcome was pain relief as measured by visual analog scale (VAS) scores, while secondary outcomes included functional improvement (Oswestry Disability I...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue